[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*
From: |
Mark Oteiza |
Subject: |
bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let* |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:29:55 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.0 (2017-09-02) |
On 12/09/17 at 02:13pm, Michael Heerdegen wrote:
> Mark Oteiza <mvoteiza@udel.edu> writes:
>
> > This is a patch implementing the above: if-let and when-let only take
> > single tuple, while {if,when,and}-let* lose the single tuple special
> > case.
>
> I wonder if we should mark if-let and when-let obsolete instead.
> Because it is only a special case of the if-let* and when-let* forms
> (with only one binding), so it is absolutely redundant. Also, I find
> the new syntax breaking with the binding-list syntax of let confusing.
> Finally, it would ease the transition for programmers: the modified
> if-let and when-let break existing code, and it's not obviously for
> programmers what's suddenly wrong.
Sounds good to me.
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, (continued)
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/09/12
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Mark Oteiza, 2017/09/12
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/09/13
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Mark Oteiza, 2017/09/13
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/09/13
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Mark Oteiza, 2017/09/13
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/09/13
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Mark Oteiza, 2017/09/13
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/09/13
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/09/12
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*,
Mark Oteiza <=