bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 22/02/2023 22:45, Yuan Fu wrote:
> Yeah that’s just an idea, and I don’t have problem adding faces. But we 
> probably can’t keep adding more and more specific faces. At one point we’ll 
> need to either add indirection, or ask users to just add their own 
> fontification rules, if it is really specific. We’ll see.

An indirection seems like a separate new feature. Might be useful for 
some, but probably unnecessary for this discussion.

> Function definition & call is totally reasonable. But adapting all the major 
> modes to use them is might be too big a change for emacs-29.

The change itself should be very straightforward. If we agree on the set 
of faces (for variables and properties as well, right?), I don't mind 
posting a patch for review.

Whether it gets accepted or not.