bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 13:31:59 +0200
> Cc: dev@rjt.dev, casouri@gmail.com, theo@thornhill.no, 61655@debbugs.gnu.org,
>  jacob.fai@gmail.com
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
> 
> On 24/02/2023 09:56, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> The important question here, I think, is whether we want to split
> >> font-lock-property-faces in two, like I did here.
> > What harm can it do, if done like you did, i.e. the faces are
> > indistinguishable by default?
> 
> Not much. We do rename the face this late into the pretest, though.

That's fine: they were introduced just a few months ago.