[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: required memchr behavior
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: required memchr behavior |
Date: |
Sat, 30 May 2009 08:16:42 +0200 |
Eric Blake wrote:
...
> It looks like the problems with glibc memchr on x86_64 are
> present in glibc 2.10, but fixed in git:
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10162
>
> But as there are systems in the wild with the broken implementation, we
> should probably start worrying about replacing the buggy memchr
> implementations.
Definitely.
- Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test., (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test., Simon Josefsson, 2009/05/26
- Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test., Eric Blake, 2009/05/26
- Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test., Eric Blake, 2009/05/26
- Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test., Bruno Haible, 2009/05/26
- Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test., Eric Blake, 2009/05/26
- required memchr behavior (was: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test.), Eric Blake, 2009/05/29
- Re: required memchr behavior, Matthew Woehlke, 2009/05/29
- Re: required memchr behavior, Eric Blake, 2009/05/29
- Re: required memchr behavior, Matthew Woehlke, 2009/05/29
- Re: required memchr behavior, Eric Blake, 2009/05/29
- Re: required memchr behavior,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: required memchr behavior (was: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test.), Bruno Haible, 2009/05/31
- Re: required memchr behavior, Jim Meyering, 2009/05/31
- Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test., Simon Josefsson, 2009/05/26
Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test., Eric Blake, 2009/05/26