[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Gnumach clean-up Round 2

From: Barry deFreese
Subject: Re: Gnumach clean-up Round 2
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 13:13:21 -0500

----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Bushnell BSG" <tb@becket.net>
To: <bug-hurd@gnu.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: Gnumach clean-up Round 2

On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 12:18 -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
Here is a patch for another round of cleanup. This gets rid of warnings for
strcmp, strlen, and printf.

I don't think we should have a file called <stdio.h> unless it's going
to support all of stdio.  <printf.h> is a much better name for a header
that includes only that.

I don't see mention of deleting the superfluous files in <kern/...>; why



Thanks for the reply. My intent would be to have a full stdio at some point. Is that the wrong approach?

I didn't delete any files, what would I have deleted?  Strings.h?

Thanks again,


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]