[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mercurial vs. git

From: Sergiu Ivanov
Subject: Re: Mercurial vs. git
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:56:34 +0300
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)


On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 04:14:40PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 15:21:28 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > I usually prefer to have a long output than some witty short text
> > which contains some jokes, some vague indications, and no real
> > instructions.  (I don't remember examples, but I've surely run into
> > something like this in the past)
> Among Mercurial users there's the saying "if you need to do anything, just 
> call hg help <command>, and you have your answer". 
> I seldomly see help output as useful as Mercurials. 
> So I think the shorter output of mercurial is an advantage, because
> I acutally find what I search for (quite quickly).

Yes, you are right, of course.  This is because hg help gives you the
right answer immediately.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]