[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: address@hidden: Bug#109613: Size column in partition list]

From: Andrew Clausen
Subject: Re: address@hidden: Bug#109613: Size column in partition list]
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 22:29:50 +1000
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 12:38:45PM +0200, Damien Genet wrote:
> hmm, so maybe
> "size (% of disk usage)"
> but maybe percantage of disk usage + percentage of filesystem usage will
> just loose the user

It would make sense if position didn't matter (i.e. for LVM)

> also, most people are completly lost with the difference between a
> partition and a filesystem, (and also many of them don't even know what
> a partition is, they buy harddisks, not partitions !)
> Parted already minimize the difference between partitions and
> filesystem, maybe there should be no difference at all fo the users (eg:
> mkpart and mkfs, the first should disapear, or only be available in
> advanced mode)

Maybe.  Any other opinions?

> > t+ == Até mais == until more == see you later
> > 
> > * clausen is amazed that fr_IRC exists...
> :)
> and now you know a new fr_IRC greeting

What?  Meuh?

/me RUNS


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]