[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Bignums in core
From: |
Thomas Bushnell BSG |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Bignums in core |
Date: |
Sat, 03 Oct 2009 23:14:29 -0700 |
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 00:57 -0700, Kon Lovett wrote:
> While not "comfortable" with 10.0 as a file position is understandable
> does anyone really use '(exact? some-filpos)'?
Huh? The point is that if the user wants (set-file-position
(inexact->exact n)) they should say so, and not have the system
magically coerce something which needs to be an exact integer.
More to the point, the need is to implement it right, and not implement
it wrong and be permanently stuck with it.
Thomas
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bignums in core, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bignums in core, Kon Lovett, 2009/10/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bignums in core, John Cowan, 2009/10/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bignums in core, Nicholas \"Indy\" Ray, 2009/10/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bignums in core, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2009/10/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bignums in core, Nicholas \"Indy\" Ray, 2009/10/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bignums in core, John Cowan, 2009/10/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bignums in core, Ivan Raikov, 2009/10/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bignums in core, Kon Lovett, 2009/10/05
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Bignums in core, Peter Bex, 2009/10/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Bignums in core, John Cowan, 2009/10/06
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bignums in core,
Thomas Bushnell BSG <=
- [Chicken-users] Re: Bignums in core, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2009/10/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Bignums in core, Nicholas \"Indy\" Ray, 2009/10/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Bignums in core, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2009/10/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Bignums in core, Jim Ursetto, 2009/10/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Bignums in core, Kon Lovett, 2009/10/04
Re: [Chicken-users] set-file-position! only works with fixnums, Andreas Rottmann, 2009/10/03