[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities

From: David Brownell
Subject: Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:31:32 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020513

I have chosen `gnu.xml.libxmlj' as package root for this project,
`gnu.xml.libxmlj.transform' as package name for the XSL transformation
part, and I'll use `libxmlj' as CVS module name. OK?

That's great.

Yep -- a fine thing to have.  I've never been a rabid believer in
"100% Pure Java", and javax.xml.transform using libxslt sounds like
like it should be good.  How does that compare (speed and memory)
with the typical 100% pure implementations?

- db

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]