[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities

From: Tom Tromey
Subject: Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities
Date: 26 Feb 2003 10:58:17 -0700
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2

>>>>> "Julian" == Julian Scheid <address@hidden> writes:

Julian> But LibxmlJ works fine for Gjdoc, it's fast as hell compared
Julian> to Xalan, and AFAICT it's the only way to wrap the latest
Julian> JAXP-only Gjdoc into an executable, because Xalan doesn't play
Julian> nicely with gcj.

There's a version of Xalan in rhug (so it must be compilable with
gcj).  I don't follow this stuff too closely.  Is that an older
version or something?

Julian> On the bright side, and not surprisingly, gcj-compiled Java using
Julian> libxml/libxslt for XML processing is RAT fast and seems to exhibit
Julian> a low memory footprint compared to Xalan or other pure-Java
Julian> solutions.

Sounds nice.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]