config-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] * config.sub: Deduplicate `basic_machine` by always allowing


From: John Ericson
Subject: Re: [PATCH] * config.sub: Deduplicate `basic_machine` by always allowing the vendor
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 02:00:32 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1

Here are the last 3 patches, revised

Yes the * is probably just a cut and paste artifact. I suppose it is harmless and could hint to the human what the expected behavior, but for simplicity I just removed it. The crx- * test I deleted from the first patch too. That leaves the 1st patch working properly.

The 2nd patch is exactly as before. It still breaks things, but that is intentional, with the 3rd patch fixing the breakage and the crx test instead. I could have combined them, but I suspect they'll be easier to read separately so I kept them separate. If you want to apply them together that is fine with me.

Thanks,

John


On 08/20/18 00:34, Ben Elliston wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 01:53:37PM -0400, John Ericson wrote:

Message-Id: <address@hidden>
From: John Ericson <address@hidden>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 13:25:58 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2]     * testsuite/config-sub.data: Add legacy test cases
To: address@hidden
This is a bit weird:

@@ -140,8 +142,13 @@ dec3100                                            
mips-dec-ultrix4.2
  decstation                                    mips-dec-ultrix4.2
  decstation-3100                                       mips-dec-ultrix4.2
  decstatn                                      mips-dec-ultrix4.2
+decsystem10*                                   pdp10-dec-tops10
+dec10*                                         pdp10-dec-tops10
+decsystem20*                                   pdp10-dec-tops20
+dec20*                                         pdp10-dec-tops20
  dicos                                         i686-pc-dicos
Why are you adding test cases with asterisks in them?  Looks like too
much copying and pasting?

Also, the revised testsuite does not pass:

Invalid configuration `crx-unknown-elf': machine `crx-unknown' not recognized
FAIL: crx-unknown-elf -> , but crx-unknown-elf should map to itself

Please remove the failing tests until you submit a patch that fixes
the problem (and the test case can accompany that patch).

Thanks,
Ben

Attachment: 0001-testsuite-config-sub.data-Add-legacy-test-cases.patch
Description: Text document

Attachment: 0002-config.sub-Move-the-big-patterns-to-the-bottom.patch
Description: Text document

Attachment: 0003-Tenative-fixes-to-issues-arriving-from-previous-comm.patch
Description: Text document


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]