[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RFE: hash-type in sum utils
From: |
Ondrej Oprala |
Subject: |
RFE: hash-type in sum utils |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jul 2012 07:18:11 -0400 (EDT) |
Hello,
I'd like to consult this RFE
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-11/msg00341.html and
find out if my proposed solutions would be satisfactory. There shouldn't be a
problem with printing the
hash-type prefix before printing the generated hash. My concerns are more
with the hash utils' logic
during hash check. Should the utils recognize the prefix/prefixless version
of the input on their own
or should they require the proposed '-l' switch during the checking as well?
Personally, I'd lean more
towards the idea of automatic prefix recognition, which shouldn't be too hard
to implement and would probably
feel more natural to everyone.
Cheers,
Ondrej Oprala
- RFE: hash-type in sum utils,
Ondrej Oprala <=
- Fwd: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Ondrej Oprala, 2012/07/25
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Pádraig Brady, 2012/07/25
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Ondrej Oprala, 2012/07/26
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Pádraig Brady, 2012/07/26
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Ondrej Oprala, 2012/07/26
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Pádraig Brady, 2012/07/26
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Ondrej Oprala, 2012/07/30
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Jim Meyering, 2012/07/30