|
From: | Jan Krämer |
Subject: | Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Draft Proposal GSoC: Offline Analysis and Visualization Tools |
Date: | Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:49:53 +0100 |
Hi Usman,
make sure your punctuation is right; only use "?" after a sentence that really is a question. Make sure there is always a space after punctuation, and don't make generalizing (and hence, wrong) statements like "And yes,Polar Codes are the coolest codes", which are a bit too colloquial for an application. Also, after make sure that the words after abbreviations ("e.g." etc) have the right capitalization. There's also still some typos; get a friend to cross-read the document critically; four eyes see more than two.
We're usually not very picky about that, but considering this is an application, I might add that on the website, and in the documentation, we generally use the capitalization "GNU Radio", not "Gnu Radio"; we didn't invent the GNU project, it was already there when Eric Blossom started with GNU Radio.
Content-wise, you've got a very fine, week-wise breakdown of your plans; however, the items you'd do in those weeks seem of very different size and defined at vastly different precisions. Comparing
Week 8 (11th July - 17th July):
a. Add functionality for saving selected plot as a picture.
b. Extract user selected samples and save it to another file.
and
Week 6 (27th June - 03rd July):
a. Coding for signal visualization in time, frequency and scatter plots in
tabbed manner.
b. Updating of plots based on tags. e.g sample rate change can translate to
change in time-axis of time domain plot.
I'd say that Week 6 contains the a significant of the core deliverable of your GSoC proposal, whilst week 8 really has only two features to complete. Maybe you can balance that timeline a little more; not all things take the same time!
Also, after literature, I'm still not sure what you mean with displaying something in a "tabbed manner"; you should explain that.
Best regards,
Marcus
On 23.03.2016 11:19, Usman Haider wrote:
I have not get any feedback on this yet. I hope I have not missed anything important? Please, provide feedback on this.
Regards,Usman
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Usman Haider <address@hidden> wrote:
UsmanI have added lambda _expression_ in deliverables based on Tim's comments. This will allow user to enter lambda _expression_ in GUI. That _expression_ will be then evaluated on samples and result will be displayed. Rather than providing fixed mathematical function (scale/normalize), user can apply anonymous functions, they want, on samples using Lambda construct. This will give user more flexibility. I have updated my proposal. You can see it on following link
https://github.com/UHaider/GSoC/blob/master/GSOC%20Proposal.pdf
Awaiting feedback.
Regards,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Usman Haider <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi Community,
I have made my proposal for the subject GSoC idea. Please have a look and give feedback. Thanks for your time.
Regards,Usman
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list address@hidden https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |