|
From: | Usman Haider |
Subject: | Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Draft Proposal GSoC: Offline Analysis and Visualization Tools |
Date: | Fri, 25 Mar 2016 00:55:36 +0500 |
Hi Usman,
make sure your punctuation is right; only use "?" after a sentence that
/really/ is a question. Make sure there is always a space after
punctuation, and don't make generalizing (and hence, wrong) statements
like "And yes,Polar Codes are the coolest codes", which are a bit /too/
colloquial for an application. Also, after make sure that the words
after abbreviations ("e.g." etc) have the right capitalization. There's
also still some typos; get a friend to cross-read the document
critically; four eyes see more than two.
We're usually not very picky about that, but considering this is an
application, I might add that on the website, and in the documentation,
we generally use the capitalization "GNU Radio", not "Gnu Radio"; we
didn't invent the GNU project, it was already there when Eric Blossom
started with GNU Radio.
Content-wise, you've got a very fine, week-wise breakdown of your plans;
however, the items you'd do in those weeks seem of very different size
and defined at vastly different precisions. Comparing
> Week 8 (11th July - 17th July):
> a. Add functionality for saving selected plot as a picture.
> b. Extract user selected samples and save it to another file.
and
> Week 6 (27th June - 03rd July):
> a. Coding for signal visualization in time, frequency and scatter plots in
> tabbed manner.
> b. Updating of plots based on tags. e.g sample rate change can
> translate to
> change in time-axis of time domain plot.
I'd say that Week 6 contains the a significant of the core deliverable
of your GSoC proposal, whilst week 8 really has only two features to
complete. Maybe you can balance that timeline a little more; not all
things take the same time!
Also, after literature, I'm still not sure what you mean with displaying
something in a "tabbed manner"; you should explain that.
Best regards,
Marcus
On 23.03.2016 11:19, Usman Haider wrote:
> I have not get any feedback on this yet. I hope I have not missed
> anything important? Please, provide feedback on this.
>
>
> Regards,
> Usman
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Usman Haider
> <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
> I have added lambda _expression_ in deliverables based on Tim's
> comments. This will allow user to enter lambda _expression_ in GUI.
> That _expression_ will be then evaluated on samples and result will
> be displayed. Rather than providing fixed mathematical function
> (scale/normalize), user can apply anonymous functions, they want,
> on samples using Lambda construct. This will give user more
> flexibility. I have updated my proposal. You can see it on
> following link
>
> https://github.com/UHaider/GSoC/blob/master/GSOC%20Proposal.pdf
>
> Awaiting feedback.
>
> Regards,
> Usman
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Usman Haider
> <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
> Hi Community,
>
> I have made my proposal for the subject GSoC idea. Please have
> a look and give feedback. Thanks for your time.
>
> https://github.com/UHaider/GSoC/blob/master/GSOC%20Proposal.pdf
>
> Regards,
> Usman
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |