[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "toll-free bridging"
From: |
strobe anarkhos |
Subject: |
Re: "toll-free bridging" |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Mar 2001 06:01:06 -0800 |
At 10:52 PM -0500 3/16/01, Jeff Teunissen wrote:
>Stefan Boehringer wrote:
>
>[snip]
>
> > Now going through flames :-)....
> > I havn't read much software licences. Didn't ASPL used to permit Apple to
> > revoke the licence? Maybe this is one of the flaws they have removed.
>
>It hasn't been removed. APSL, even 1.1, gives Apple the power to revoke any
>and all APSL licenses if someone even makes a patent infringement claim. They
>don't even have to prove actual patent infringement, Apple can just go
>"seeya!" and you no longer have any right to use their code, or even your code
>that includes some of theirs.
So what do you expect them to do? If Darwin has patented source the dumbass who
added it isn't going to be sued, Apple is going to be sued.
I mean DUH! How the HELL are you going to prove source isn't a patent unless
Apple represents the Darwin developer IN COURT?!
Geez you people are so unrealistic.
- "toll-free bridging", strobe anarkhos, 2001/03/16
- Re: "toll-free bridging", Frederic Stark, 2001/03/16
- Re: "toll-free bridging", strobe anarkhos, 2001/03/16
- Re: "toll-free bridging", Nicola Pero, 2001/03/16
- Re: "toll-free bridging", strobe anarkhos, 2001/03/16
- Re: "toll-free bridging", Stefan Boehringer, 2001/03/16
- Re: "toll-free bridging", Jeff Teunissen, 2001/03/16
- Re: "toll-free bridging", Jeff Teunissen, 2001/03/16
- Re: "toll-free bridging",
strobe anarkhos <=
- Re: "toll-free bridging", Jeff Teunissen, 2001/03/17
- Re: "toll-free bridging", strobe anarkhos, 2001/03/17
- Re: "toll-free bridging", Nicola Pero, 2001/03/17
- Message not available
- Re: "toll-free bridging", strobe anarkhos, 2001/03/17
- Re: "toll-free bridging", Pedro Ivo Andrade Tavares, 2001/03/16
Re: "toll-free bridging", Frederic Stark, 2001/03/16