[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Proposal question.
From: |
Bissell, Tim |
Subject: |
RE: Proposal question. |
Date: |
Thu, 9 May 2002 18:23:04 +0100 |
> >
>>> One of the things I found odd about the Users domain was that it was the
>>> only of the four that broke from the $(DOMAIN)/[structure] format.
>>> Having, for example, /home/harrison/GNUstep/[Library|etc...] was odd, in
>>> comparison to $((USER_DOMAIN)=/home/$(username))/[Library|etc...].
[...]
>>> Now, if people don't want to add extra visible directories to their home
> > > dirs, I can understand that. Under LinuxSTEP, those directories exist
> > > anyway, so there's no harm.
Just a note - If a user has a networked home directory, and can log in
on MacOS X and GNUstep/* machines, then having a GNUstep/ subdirectory
helps keep the MacOS X and GNUstep Library etc. directories separate.
I have to have two separate home directories at home (one for OPENSTEP, one
for MacOS X) to avoid clashes between Library/OmniWeb, Library/Create, and
no doubt others that I don't want to think about.
regards,
Tim
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail
disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to
http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: Proposal question., (continued)
- Re: Proposal question., Adam Fedor, 2002/05/10
- Re: Proposal question., Tim Harrison, 2002/05/08
- Re: Proposal question., Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2002/05/08
- Re: Proposal question., Martin Brecher, 2002/05/08
- RE: Proposal question.,
Bissell, Tim <=