Re: Proposal question.

[Adam Fedor]

Tim Harrison wrote:
> c.  If no, would anyone be terribly offended if a patch was created that 
> the LinuxSTEP base team could apply to a release of GNUstep for 
> integration into LinuxSTEP?

Sorry I took so long to reply. If you want something changed in GNUstep, 
the best way to do it is send a patch. However, given the minor uproar 
after such a relatively minor change as switching 'Apps' to 
'Applications', I can't really guarentee it will be (completely) 
accepted. Making the patch 'optional' via some configure or make switch 
would help, as long as it's well written.

> d.  Is there an official release planned soon, so that the LinuxSTEP 
> base team can use that as a baseline (as the CVS code tends to change at 
> a moment's notice, effectively forcing applications to be recompiled)?

See http://www.gnustep.org/developers/schedule.html

The base library, however, should be stable. You shouldn't have to 
recompile Apps when it changes. The gui is another matter, though.

--
Adam Fedor, Digital Optics Corp.      | I'm glad I hate spinach, because
http://www.doc.com                    | if I didn't, I'd eat it, and you
                                      | know how I hate the stuff.