[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GSXML
|
From: |
Nicola Pero |
|
Subject: |
Re: GSXML |
|
Date: |
Mon, 20 May 2002 12:41:14 +0100 (BST) |
> Reports of all such inconsistencies welcome ... the classes were
> originally written
> by someone unfamiliar with OpenStep, and while Nicola and I have put
> some effort
> into making them more consistent, the job is not complete.
Since you quote me, I need to correct you - as I already said in public
posts, I think it's not just a problem of consistency or of details ...
the GSXML classes and their API are basically flawed and should be totally
rewritten.
- GSXML, Stefan Urbanek, 2002/05/19
- Re: GSXML, Marcus Müller, 2002/05/19
- Re: GSXML, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/05/20
- Re: GSXML,
Nicola Pero <=
- Re: GSXML, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/05/20
- Re: GSXML, Nicola Pero, 2002/05/20
- Re: GSXML, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/05/20
- Re: GSXML, Nicola Pero, 2002/05/20
- Re: GSXML, Nicola Pero, 2002/05/20
- Re: GSXML, Nicola Pero, 2002/05/20
- Re: GSXML, Nicola Pero, 2002/05/20
- Re: GSXML, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/05/21