[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep?
From: |
Chris B. Vetter |
Subject: |
Re: gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep? |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:20:59 -0700 |
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 23:12:41 +0100
Pete French <pete@twisted.org.uk> wrote:
> currently I am rebuilding gccc3.0.4 with the WANT_THREADS_SUPPORT
> option as that was a difference I spotted later.
That might help ;-)
> > modification to use CC=gcc30 (3.0.4, instead of 2.95.3) and configure
> > gnustep-base with --disable-openssl
> ...you kno, I have just crawled all over the config scripts in 'base;
> trying to find out how to do that! :-)
Just add it to 'compile-all' ?
> > Except for the occasional (and expected) "urgh, SIGSEGV received"
> > from Window Maker ;-)
> ?! I've never, ever, seen WindowMaker crash in all the time I've been
> running it (which is only the last 3 years admittedly, but still, zero
> crashes is zero crashes).
Uhm, that's crashing as in 'you will get the notify panel, telling you
that it received a SIGSEGV, and a drop-down menu you can use to select
what you want WM to do (eg, restart)'
> This is all very interesting as we do seem to have very different
> experiences with what *should* be the same software.
Check the mailing-list, I'm not the only one.
--
Chris
- Error compiling Gnustep, Pavel West, 2002/09/28
- gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep?, Jim McLoughlin, 2002/09/28
- Re: gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep?, Pete French, 2002/09/29
- Re: gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep?, Jim McLoughlin, 2002/09/30
- Re: gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep?, Dennis Leeuw, 2002/09/30
- Re: gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep?, Chris B. Vetter, 2002/09/30
- Re: gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep?, Pete French, 2002/09/30
- Re: gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep?, Chris B. Vetter, 2002/09/30
- Re: gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep?, Pete French, 2002/09/30
- Re: gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep?,
Chris B. Vetter <=
- Re: gcc 3.1 OK for gnustep?, Pete French, 2002/09/30