[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc
From: |
Chris B. Vetter |
Subject: |
Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jun 2003 14:38:55 -0700 |
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 23:03:53 +0200
Fred Kiefer <fredkiefer@gmx.de> wrote:
[...]
> So after a short period, which we may use to find all the different
> problems hidden in the documenation build that was never used by
> anybody, I would like to have it removed from the automatic build
> again.
Why not put a makefile in the top-level directory that only 'responds'
to a 'make doc=yes' (of course, checking whether GNUstep is already
installed, first). The advantage would be that you do NOT have to create
-make and -base first if you just want the documentation.
Why does -base use 'autogsdoc' from the base/Tools/obj/ directory anyway
instead of the one that (presumably) got installed just a few minutes
earlier?
--
Chris
- Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc, (continued)
- Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc, Pete French, 2003/06/20
- Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/06/23
- Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/06/23
- Bug reports and tracking tools, was "Re: problems building - Bug reports and tracking tools, was "Re: problems building -, Ian Jones, 2003/06/20
- Re: Bug reports and tracking tools, was "Re: problems building - Bug reports and tracking tools, was "Re: problems building -, Gregory John Casamento, 2003/06/20
Re: problems building - faiiling due to autogsdoc, Fred Kiefer, 2003/06/19