[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XML idea
From: |
Alexander Malmberg |
Subject: |
Re: XML idea |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Jan 2004 16:56:46 +0100 |
Helge Hess wrote:
[snip]
> > In other words, I think that if/when we get contributions of MacOS-X
> > classes we don't particularly like, we could put them in the additions
> > library, and document them as unsupported or semi-supported ...
> > meaning that the core developers would give low priority to their
> > support.
>
> This just doesn't make sense to me. If it isn't supported, I can't use
> it.
And this makes no sense to me. This is free software. Nothing is
supported. :)
(Of course, developers generally try to help, time permitting, but there
you already have the problem (from a user pov) that some parts are less
supported than others.)
- Alexander Malmberg
- Re: XML idea, (continued)
- Re: XML idea, Pete French, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Jason Clouse, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Helge Hess, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, richard, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Helge Hess, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Helge Hess, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea,
Alexander Malmberg <=
- Re: XML idea, Helge Hess, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Marcel Weiher, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Alexander Malmberg, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Pete French, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Helge Hess, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Adam Fedor, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Jason Clouse, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/07