[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: XML idea

From: Fred Kiefer
Subject: Re: XML idea
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 12:18:24 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030821

Alexander Malmberg wrote:
Fred Kiefer wrote:

As much as I like to see diversity, I really don't like the idea of
forking GNUstep.

PortabilityKit doesn't look like a fork; it's a separate library that
implements things that GNUstep doesn't/won't.

Could you please give an example of a Cocoa extension, that was submitted but turned down because GNUstep doesn't want it? If not from the past, than at least as a theoretical experiment. It is clear, neither you nor I will waste our time on classes we don't like. But would you really trun down an implementation of NSXMLParser, if this could be added as an optional component to base?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]