Re: [Fwd: [gentoo-security] pax and objc]

[Adam Fedor]

On Jul 1, 2004, at 4:28 PM, pageexec@freemail.hu wrote:

> if libffi can accomplish the same things as ffcall but without
> runtime code generation, then my preference would also be the
> former, from a security point of view.
libffi is part of gcc now and is actively developed, so that's probably 
a good reason to start preferring it over ffcall in GNUstep. 
Particularly if it solves this problem. Hopefully some one can tell us 
that for sure.