Re: more graphic file formats

[Adam Fedor]

It would be nicer if more formats could be implemented via services 
(Actually this currently doesn't work in GUI, so it would also be nice 
to add that as well...).


On Dec 7, 2004, at 7:25 PM, Vaisburd, Haim wrote:

> Yes, I also think we should not introduce another
> library dependency. We currenly have TIFF, JPEG, PNG,
> not sure about GIF. I though this was plenty...
> On the other hand, can we _write_ these formats now?
>
> Tima.
>
> --- Gregory John Casamento <greg_casamento@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > My concerns here are:
> > 2) ImageMagick is not part of GNUstep, so code in GNUstep shouldn't 
> > depend on
> > it.
> >
> > --- Karsten Fuhrmann <karsten_fuhrmann@cartoon-film.de> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > > i am thinking about writing another Subclass of NSBitmapImageRep 
> > > which
> > > will use ImageMagick to handle almost any image format.
> > > Is there any concern about this?
> > > I want a solution which can be part of the GNUstep source tree!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep