[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: reincarnating nextstep
From: |
David Ayers |
Subject: |
Re: reincarnating nextstep |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:57:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20051002) |
Chris B. Vetter schrieb:
> On 11/18/05, Rogelio M. Serrano Jr. <rogelio@smsglobal.net> wrote:
> [...]
>
>
> Not intending to troll here, or start another OS-related flame-war,
> but why base it on Linux?
>
> I guess this is more of a general question, but why not focus on a
> more 'original' clone and base it on Darwin? There are a couple of
> aspects, that IMHO would make Darwin the more obvious choice,
[snip]
I think one important aspect is the support for frameworks by the tool
chain, which most likely will never happen in mainline GNU/Linux (or
GNU/Hurd). I think GNU/Darwin should definitely be considered even
though I have no idea in what state it is in.
Cheers,
David
- reincarnating nextstep, Rogelio M. Serrano Jr., 2005/11/18
- Re: reincarnating nextstep, Sašo Kiselkov, 2005/11/18
- Re: reincarnating nextstep, Rogelio M. Serrano Jr., 2005/11/18
- Re: reincarnating nextstep, Graham J Lee, 2005/11/18
- Re: reincarnating nextstep, Rogelio M. Serrano Jr., 2005/11/18
- Re: reincarnating nextstep, Rogelio M. Serrano Jr., 2005/11/18
- Message not available
- Re: reincarnating nextstep, silverd, 2005/11/18
- Re: reincarnating nextstep, Rogelio M. Serrano Jr., 2005/11/18
- Re: reincarnating nextstep, reuss, 2005/11/18
- Message not available
- Re: reincarnating nextstep, silverd, 2005/11/18
- Re: reincarnating nextstep, Sašo Kiselkov, 2005/11/18
- Re: reincarnating nextstep, comrade, 2005/11/18