Re: reincarnating nextstep

[Rogelio M. Serrano Jr.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2005-11-18 17:02:44 +0800 Graham J Lee
<leeg@teaching.physics.ox.ac.uk> wrote:

> I think that to make GNUstep on Darwin realistically maintainable as 
> an OS 
> release, either GNUstep would need to work with Apple's gcc or Darwin 
> would 
> need to work with FSF's gcc - I don't know if either is true. Also, 
> to make a 
> "true" NEXTSTEP-a-like you'd need a display postscript system...

Another issue is that I believe that gcc-4.1 is necessary for the
"Next clone". And Im still testing it. Also I find uclibc more
important than glibc for various reasons and im still testing it with
gcc-4.1. Also modular xorg is not released yet. so I would rather play
with the "designed for openstep" system than dig into kernels for now.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using the GPG bundle for GNUMail

iD8DBQFDfaGhyihxuQOYt8wRAjA/AJwOheak2vE8zi4rkUEB70HU3e7SEwCfd8qe
52rJKNnhsFts4bIBFLN5xDw=
=ShT3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----