[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has Gn
From: |
Doc O'Leary |
Subject: |
Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has GnuStep edition |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:13:24 -0600 |
User-agent: |
MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (PPC Mac OS X) |
In article <mailman.1.1295997573.20658.discuss-gnustep@gnu.org>,
Ivan Vuãica <ivucica@gmail.com> wrote:
> * that does not mean GNUstep is not helpful -- because it is!
I would make the argument that it is increasingly helpful to have
GNUstep around given the growth of the iPhone and iPad. Part of the
hard sell for GNUstep was that the Mac itself wasn't a huge market,
despite being the *major* market for ObjC software. So the proposition
of GNUstep at that time was a fraction of a fraction.
With the rise of iOS, we see companies have become more willing to
invest in development of ObjC software. That gives them a resource so
they can then say "hey, how else can we leverage this software?". That
might mean they look closer at making Mac apps, but it might also mean
they look closer at GNUstep as a way to have their .m objects functional
on their server platforms. At this stage, I think that would be the
best way to find a market for GNUstep.
--
iPhone apps that matter: http://appstore.subsume.com/
My personal UDP list: 127.0.0.1, localhost, googlegroups.com, astraweb.com,
and probably your server, too.
- Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has GnuStep edition, (continued)
- Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has GnuStep edition, David Chisnall, 2011/01/24
- Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has GnuStep edition, Riccardo Mottola, 2011/01/24
- Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has GnuStep edition, Zhang Weiwu, Beijing, 2011/01/24
- Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has GnuStep edition, Ivan Vučica, 2011/01/25
- Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has GnuStep edition, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2011/01/25
- Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has GnuStep edition, Niels Grewe, 2011/01/25
- Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has GnuStep edition, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2011/01/25
- Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has GnuStep edition, Ivan Vučica, 2011/01/25
- Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has GnuStep edition, Riccardo Mottola, 2011/01/25
- Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has GnuStep edition, Ivan Vučica, 2011/01/25
- Message not available
- Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has GnuStep edition,
Doc O'Leary <=
- Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has GnuStep edition, Ivan Vučica, 2011/01/28
- Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has GnuStep edition, David Chisnall, 2011/01/25
- Message not available
- Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has GnuStep edition, Doc O'Leary, 2011/01/26
Message not available
Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has GnuStep edition, Banlu Kemiyatorn, 2011/01/25
- Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has GnuStep edition, Ivan Vučica, 2011/01/25
- Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has GnuStep edition, Banlu Kemiyatorn, 2011/01/25
- Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has GnuStep edition, Ivan Vučica, 2011/01/25
- Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has GnuStep edition, Banlu Kemiyatorn, 2011/01/26
- Re: question about low availability of Mac OS X applications that has GnuStep edition, Ivan Vučica, 2011/01/26