|
From: | Charles Benke |
Subject: | Re: [Dolibarr-dev] [Dolibarr-association] Dolibarr 4.0.1 |
Date: | Wed, 19 Oct 2016 21:34:59 +0200 |
OK If I follow your argumentation … I will deliver a brand new version of all my modules each week, because I have decide to planned like this Even if the version is not enough tested, even the previous release have some know bug, even if the document are not upgraded … And I will explain to my disgruntled customers that this is a good method to make a better quality and simplify their upgrade ... Release a version every 6 months because FOR YOU is more simple is not acceptable. I do not develop modules dolibarr because it is easy but because it allows users to better manage their company, create growth, the emploies ... If the major release issued every 6 months was free of bug, stable and did not require another install/update after barely one month to correct the most glaring bugs that will not be dramatic The minimum straightforwardness that we can have with users downloading a new major release is to explain that this version DO NOT BE USED IN PRODUCTION. Bien cordialement, Charlie Benke De : Dolibarr-dev [mailto:address@hidden De la part de Laurent Destailleur (aka Eldy) Your argue is not coherent. You say you want less version so you have to test your module less often. It also meas your customer upgrade version less often. So why just don't you make your tests every 2 versions. Result will be same. You will work only every 1 year instead of every 6 month, and your customer would be able to upgrade only every 1 year (once your module is validated for the version) instead of every 6 month. It's just your choice and the choice of your customer. Having a release every 1 year, means nor integrator, nor users have choice. Also it means a lower quality and exponentiel work to make upgrade. But if you prefer to upgrade your module once per year, just do it. You can, it's just a choice you must do. It is not because there is a new version, that you must upgrade your module. If you prefer to follow a 1 year release, just follow this rythm and ask you customer to follow also this rythm. The only difference is that the ryhtm is defined by you instead of being imposed be a dolibarr low release rythm. And i think it is better to let integrator to decide their release/upgrade frequency then having this decied/forced by Dolibarr. 2016-10-19 16:49 GMT+02:00 Charles Benke <address@hidden>:
-- EMail: address@hidden ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Google+: https://plus.google.com/+LaurentDestailleur-Open-Source-Expert/ Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/eldy10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ * Dolibarr (Project leader): http://www.dolibarr.org (make a donation for Dolibarr project via Paypal: address@hidden) * AWStats (Author) : http://awstats.sourceforge.net (make a donation for AWStats project via Paypal: address@hidden) * AWBot (Author) : http://awbot.sourceforge.net * CVSChangeLogBuilder (Author) : http://cvschangelogb.sourceforge.net |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |