[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DotGNU]Re: C# class library

From: Rhys Weatherley
Subject: Re: [DotGNU]Re: C# class library
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 17:25:27 +1000

Miguel de Icaza wrote:

> So the bottom line is: before you complain about Mono C# library not
> being suitable for you for a legal reason that is not clear to you,
> consider that the pieces of Portable.NET that you have were reverse
> engineered, and not even built from the spec (there was no spec back
> then).  You do not mind Portable.NET's code being reverse engineered,
> but you seem to mind Mono written-from-spec code.  Which seems to be
> inconsistent.

Portable.NET was not built as a result of reverse engineering
Microsoft's code.    Your claim is FUD.

There is more than one way to interoperate with an unknown
target: reverse engineering the target's source code is a very
poor way and I did not use it.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]