[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[DotGNU]Re: [Mono-list] Resource System Proposal

From: Guy Murphy
Subject: [DotGNU]Re: [Mono-list] Resource System Proposal
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:10:00 -0000


My understanding of these issues isn't the best, so feel free to correct any
misunderstandings I have.

Consulting the document you provided....

Extending the C# language may be drastic, and hence may be unattractive, but
it could also lead to cleaner code, and hence be desirable.

Hmmm, from my point of view drastic is an understatement.

You're advocating moving away from the ECMA spec. I would have hoped that we
would all have some awareness of what this can lead to and why we have need
of the ECMA spec in this domain.

_("Hellow World!")

Isn't source compatible with the spec. Given that it's normally MS who gets
slated for breaking specs isn't this all a little ironic comming from an
open source project?

If I'm misunderstanding things, I'm more than happy to be set straight.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Rhys Weatherley" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:31 AM
Subject: [Mono-list] Resource System Proposal

> The string resource handling in .NET is a bit of a pain to use,
> and so I've come up with some alternatives that Mono and
> Portable.NET could use instead.  The aim is to use the same
> system for both projects, rather than inventing two mutually
> incompatible versions.
> I've been discussing these ideas with Miguel de Icaza, and
> I would like to get some wider feedback as to what other
> people think.  Nothing is set in stone: the more feedback,
> the better.
> Cheers,
> Rhys.
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist  -  address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]