[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and busine
From: |
Peter Minten |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business) |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 19:27:26 +0200 |
Norbert Bollow wrote:
>
> Besides hoping to get protection from an organisation with "one
> body rule methodology" (yes, one of the things that
> FreeDevelopers had promised was to give us is this protection),
> there's another way of protecting yourself:
>
> Look at what Rhys has done.
>
> He has set up a company called "Southern Storm Software, Pty
> Ltd" which has a single employee (Rhys). From a legal
> perspective, DotGNU Portable.NET is not produced by Rhys, but
> rather by this company. This makes it much more difficult to
> personally harass Rhys through lawsuits of any kind.
>
> Only the truly paranoid would think that this kind of protection
> is necessary also for small-time contributors to Free Software
> projects. But if you're planning to do something of true
> significance (and from your earlier comments about "network
> operating system" stuff I think this may be the case) then I'll
> strongly recommend that you should set up such a
> "self-incorporation".
I don't know about the requirments in other parts of the world for setting up a
corporate body (to give the owners legal protection) but here in the Netherlands
you need a 2 or more persons to set up the stuff and I believe there were some
other requirments. Wouldn't it be best to provide a DotGNU corporation for this
stuff (the folks needing legal protection would probably qualify as employees
anyway) since some of us might not be able to start a corporation? I know
bizplan died, but with FreeDevelopers going down it could be useful to give the
concept another try.
Greetings,
Peter
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe: User Interfaces), (continued)
- [DotGNU]DotGNU and business, Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU and business, Boris Kolar, 2002/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU and business, Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/11
- [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business, Timothy Rue, 2002/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business, D.I.Freeman, 2002/07/09
- [DotGNU]freedom and the "quality of [GNU/]Linux" (was Re: DotGNU and business), S11001001, 2002/07/10
- [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business),
Peter Minten <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), Timothy Rue, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/15
- Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), Timothy Rue, 2002/07/15
- Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/15
- [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business, Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business, Timothy Rue, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business, Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/15
- [DotGNU]Volunteers wanted for sponsorships stuff (was Re: DotGNU and business), Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/11
- Message not available
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU and business, Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/29
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU and business, Timothy Rue, 2002/07/29