[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature
From: |
Rhys Weatherley |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Sep 2002 09:26:58 +1000 |
Gopal V wrote:
> And I hope it's the right one as ... Heaven forbid, I wouldn't want
> a managed pointer (ILEngineType_M) as a 'this' object... So it's
> ILEngineType_MV ... which should have been a typo ;-)
Managed pointers are perfectly valid as "this" objects
when calling methods on value types. Changing this would
be _very_ unwise. There is probably something else going
on here - perhaps a compiler bug.
Cheers,
Rhys.
- [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Jonathan P Springer, 2002/09/25
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/09/26
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Jonathan P Springer, 2002/09/26
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Jonathan P Springer, 2002/09/26
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Gopal V, 2002/09/26
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature,
Rhys Weatherley <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Gopal V, 2002/09/26
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/09/26
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Gopal V, 2002/09/26
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/09/27
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/09/26