[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Backing up desktop virtual machines?
From: |
Rubin Abdi |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Backing up desktop virtual machines? |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jul 2014 18:57:53 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/32.0a2 |
Laurence Perkins (OE) wrote on 2014-07-22 09:52:
> My attempts to reply to the list don't seem to be getting through, so
> I'll send you my best guess as to the problem directly and you can
> forward it on to the list if I am correct.
Maybe the list admin is around and will see this.
> Duplicity only backs up changed parts of the file, but must scan the
> entire file to determine which parts have changed. If your .VDIs for
> your VMs are large, this will take a while. Try snapshotting the VMs.
> This will cause all changes to the disks to be written to a separate,
> potentially much smaller file. If you snapshot after each incremental,
> then all the changes for the VM will be in their own, small file that
> duplicity can just pick up and add to the archive without having to scan
> the big, unchanged root VDI.
Thanks to both you and Edgar for pointing that out. I had no idea.
That's kind of awesome. It now makes sense that the slow down is simply
from Duplicity having to deal with scanning a large file in order to
find diffs.
> Then, before running your next full backup, merge all the snapshots back
> into the main image.
I'll try using Virtualbox with snapshots and see how that goes. I've
only been using Duplicity for a month. How often should I do a full
backup if I'm running it for my whole laptop?
Thanks!
--
Rubin
address@hidden
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature