[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[4]: ill-advised changes [was key bindings in hideshow.el]
From: |
Eric M. Ludlam |
Subject: |
Re[4]: ill-advised changes [was key bindings in hideshow.el] |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Feb 2001 10:08:52 -0500 |
>>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> seems to think that:
>
>On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Eric M. Ludlam wrote:
[ ... ]
>> Here are some relevant passages:
>>
>> -------- Keymaps and Minor Modes ------------
>> The key sequences bound in a minor mode should consist of `C-c'
>> followed by a punctuation character *other than* `{', `}', `<', `>',
>> `:' or `;'. (Those few punctuation characters are reserved for major
>> modes.)
>> -------
>>
>> -------- Major Mode Conventions -------------
>> * The key sequences bound in a major mode keymap should usually
>> start with `C-c', followed by a control character, a digit, or `{',
>> `}', `<', `>', `:' or `;'. The other punctuation characters are
>> reserved for minor modes, and ordinary letters are reserved for
>> users.
>
>Does this resolve the issue?
[ ... ]
It resolves the issue of having to come up with a set of standards. :)
As for C-c C-c, I personally don't like it when it is bound to a
comment command, but that is up the the mode author. As for
hide-show, it should not be using C-c C-c anyway (based on the above
suggestions in the manual.)
If hide-show wants small key-bindings (C-c @ C-o of outline mode which
follows the standard can be long winded for a quick command) perhaps
it needs a different mechanism or standard. I don't have a good
recommendation for that.
Eric
--
Eric Ludlam: address@hidden, address@hidden
Home: www.ultranet.com/~zappo Siege: www.siege-engine.com
Emacs: www.ultranet.com/~zappo/fsf.shtml GNU: www.gnu.org
- Re: ill-advised changes [was Re: key bindings in hideshow.el], Eli Zaretskii, 2001/02/01
- Re: ill-advised changes [was Re: key bindings in hideshow.el], thi, 2001/02/01
- Re: ill-advised changes [was Re: key bindings in hideshow.el], Eli Zaretskii, 2001/02/01
- Re[2]: ill-advised changes [was key bindings in hideshow.el], Eric M. Ludlam, 2001/02/01
- Re: Re[2]: ill-advised changes [was key bindings in hideshow.el], Eli Zaretskii, 2001/02/01
- Re[4]: ill-advised changes [was key bindings in hideshow.el],
Eric M. Ludlam <=
- Re: ill-advised changes [was key bindings in hideshow.el], thi, 2001/02/01
- Re: ill-advised changes [was key bindings in hideshow.el], Eli Zaretskii, 2001/02/01
- Re: ill-advised changes [was key bindings in hideshow.el], thi, 2001/02/01
- Re: ill-advised changes [was key bindings in hideshow.el], Eli Zaretskii, 2001/02/01
- Re: Re[2]: ill-advised changes [was key bindings in hideshow.el], Kai Großjohann, 2001/02/06
- Re: ill-advised changes [was key bindings in hideshow.el], Richard Stallman, 2001/02/07
- Re: ill-advised changes [was key bindings in hideshow.el], Kai Großjohann, 2001/02/07
- Re[2]: ill-advised changes [was key bindings in hideshow.el], Eric M. Ludlam, 2001/02/07
- Re: ill-advised changes [was key bindings in hideshow.el], Richard Stallman, 2001/02/11
- Re: ill-advised changes [was key bindings in hideshow.el], Per Abrahamsen, 2001/02/12