[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Wed, 06 Feb 2002 09:31:54 -0500
> No, not the same: now it is complaining about 3 variables instead of 2.
No big difference: it's still a prime number.
> > Is this really a problem? I do not think we should workaround this issue
> > as it is now in msdos.c:
> > /* The following variables are required so that cus-start.el won't
> > complain about unbound variables. */
> I know all about that ;-) I just wonder whether this is the way to
> fix these issues; it doesn't look clean. Also, what, if anything,
How about changing cus-start to ignore those vars that aren't
bound ? Oh wait, that's what it does already, isn't it ?
Is the warning really annoying ? Or useful ?