Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.

[Rob Browning]

Alan Shutko <address@hidden> writes:

> )  But if you did two separate clean builds, the build id in the
> version would be the same and they would use the same file, and have
> problems... I think it uses offsets or something.

Do you know what constitutes a "clean build"?  I'm guessing that
anything that deletes the existing DOC-* file would cause you to get
the "same file".

If you're suggesting that I just reconfigure, then re-build without a
make clean, I'm wondering if that might be asking for trouble in the
long run, even if it works right now.  However, if that's OK, I'm
happy to proceed that direction.

Oh, and I'm also fine with just trying to handle things the way RH
handled them, but if there's some way the developers know they'd like
this "fixed", that's even better.  Off the top of my head, I wonder if
something as simple as naming the DOC file with a timestamp might be
enough -- i.e. DOC-20020610-231201 or similar.

Thanks

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD