[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question. |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Jun 2002 16:16:41 -0400 |
> I changed the lisp/Makefile.in custom-deps rule as follows. The only
> difference it to write a timestamped file containing $$wins to /tmp.
> The resulting files (one from the X build, and one from the no-X
> build) were identical, but the cus-load.el files in the two resulting
> build trees were still different.
>
> Peculiar. I guess the next step is to put some tracing code in
> cus-dep.el itself.
IIRC It's because cus-dep.el loads files and the load order is important.
The set of preloaded files is different, so the load order is different
so the resulting cus-load.el is different.
This is especially the case when one variable is defcustom'd in two
files (as is the case for c-indent-level), but I suspect it's also
the case for other situations.
Stefan
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., (continued)
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/06/15
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Rob Browning, 2002/06/20
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/06/21
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Rob Browning, 2002/06/21
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Rob Browning, 2002/06/22
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Richard Stallman, 2002/06/23
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Rob Browning, 2002/06/24
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Rob Browning, 2002/06/24
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Richard Stallman, 2002/06/24
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Rob Browning, 2002/06/24
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/06/25
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Rob Browning, 2002/06/25
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/06/25
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Richard Stallman, 2002/06/26
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Rob Browning, 2002/06/26
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Richard Stallman, 2002/06/25
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Rob Browning, 2002/06/10
Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Richard Stallman, 2002/06/01