[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No calc in pretest?
From: |
Jon Cast |
Subject: |
Re: No calc in pretest? |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Jul 2002 18:14:18 -0500 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
> Since the code changes to use minor-minor numbers appear to be
> (heh) minor, what's the problem with using them?
> Sorry, I don't understand which proposal you are asking about.
I think he means numbering bug-fix releases as 21.x.{2,3,...}. The
bug-fix number is the `minor-minor' number.
Jon Cast
- Re: No calc in pretest?, (continued)
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/04
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/04
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/04
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?,
Jon Cast <=
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Francesco Potorti`, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/08
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/08
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/09
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/04
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/04
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/05