Re: [mew-int 01585] Re: windows 1252

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:13:34 +0900 (JST)
> From: Kazu Yamamoto (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCOzNLXE9CSScbKEI=?=) <address@hidden>
> (2) Co-exist of Emacs and XEmacs.
> 
>       The 'emacs-mule coding-system is not appropriate since XEmacs
>       has a different internal representation from Emacs'one. Note
>       Emacsen use different 'emacs-mule coding-system among
>       versions.
> 
> The one-and-only coding-system which, I found, meets the requirements
> above is 'ctext.

In that case, extending ctext to handle the problem we were discussing
in this thread would not be a good idea: IIRC, XEmacs doesn't support
extended segments, and non-MULE Emacsen certainly don't.  Or am I
missing something?