[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line
From: |
Jari Aalto |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Mar 2004 23:31:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt) (i386-msvc-nt5.0.2195) |
* 2004-03-26 David Kastrup <dak <AT> gnu.org> mail.default.spool
| jari.aalto <AT> poboxes.com (Jari Aalto+mail.linux) writes:
|
| > * 2004-03-25 no-spam <AT> cua.dk (Kim Storm) gmane.emacs.devel
| > * <http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djq&address@hidden>
| >
| > | C-x c c => compile
| > | C-x c r => recompile
| > | C-x c n => next error
| > | C-x c p => prev error
| > | C-x c g => grep
| > |
| >
| > Excellent idea
|
| Since C-x c is too close to C-x C-c, how about mixing the proposals
| into an easily accessable binding?
|
| C-c C-c C-c => compile
| C-c C-c C-r => recompile
| C-c C-c C-n => next error
| C-c C-c C-p => previous error
| C-c C-c Uhh... do we really need a case for grep?
Really, if there are any more C-c C- C- C- key combinations, my hand
will retire soon. The first proposal of "C-c c" prefix is much more
friendly to wrists.
Jari
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, (continued)
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Danilo Segan, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Juri Linkov, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Joachim Nilsson, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Jari Aalto+mail.linux, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line,
Jari Aalto <=
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Jari Aalto+mail.emacs, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/28
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/25