[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: next-error-last-buffer
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: next-error-last-buffer |
Date: |
Fri, 28 May 2004 00:55:55 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:
> Maybe if there's more than one next-error capable buffers that are
> linked together (e.g. occur on a diff) then C-u next-error should
> advance through the "underlying" next-error buffer (the diff) while
> next-error should advance through the "overlay" next-error buffer
> (the occur). If the user does a grep on an occur on a diff, for
> instance, then C-u C-u next-error advances through the diff, C-u
> next-error advances through the occur, and next-error advances
> through the grep.
C-u prefix of next-error is already used to reparse the error
message buffer and start at the first error.
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, (continued)
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/25
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/27
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/27
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/28
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/28
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/29
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/30
Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/25
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/25
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/26
- Re: next-error-last-buffer,
Juri Linkov <=
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/28
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/28
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/28
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/29
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/29
Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/25