[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: emacs -Q not documented

From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: emacs -Q not documented
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:27:19 +0900

On Apr 5, 2005 4:31 PM, Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> wrote:
> Just because we cannot find a long name for it -- that's silly, IMO!
> Please keep the option.  It serves the purpose it was added for very
> well!!

There seems no reason not to split it into a couple of more coherent
options though.

Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]