[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs -Q not documented
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: emacs -Q not documented |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Apr 2005 16:05:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> --basic-defaults
>
> would be another possibility.
Still, "defaults" is non-informative in this context.
IMO --minimal would be good, but is too close to --minimize.
Some synonymes are:
--basic
--slim
--mean
--reduced
--nominal
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, (continued)
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/04
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/04
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, David Kastrup, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, David Kastrup, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, David Kastrup, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Richard Stallman, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/06
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Nick Roberts, 2005/04/06
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Richard Stallman, 2005/04/06
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/04/06
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/06
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, David Kastrup, 2005/04/06