[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs -Q not documented
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: emacs -Q not documented |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:44:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Robert J. Chassell" <address@hidden> writes:
> > -Q
>
> It is intended to be an option turn off all "extra features".
>
> Yes. The option is helpful and should be kept.
>
> It is easier than evoking Emacs with an equivalent long string of
> options, which are:
>
> emacs -q \
> --no-site-file \
> --no-blinking-cursor \
> --eval '(progn
> (tooltip-mode -1)
> (tool-bar-mode -1)
> (menu-bar-mode -1)
> (scroll-bar-mode -1)
> (setq inhibit-startup-message t))'
Well, that argument would hold for any option string.
> (`nil' instead of `-1' causes the evaluated functions to produce a
> message, so is no good.)
>
> If we need a long name for `-Q', and do not wish to use `--plain',
> please consider
>
> --no-init-site-splash-decorations-blinking
>
> which is long and ugly but does tell you what the option avoids.
--basic-defaults
would be another possibility.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, (continued)
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Richard Stallman, 2005/04/04
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/04
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/04
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, David Kastrup, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, David Kastrup, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Richard Stallman, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/06
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Nick Roberts, 2005/04/06
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Richard Stallman, 2005/04/06
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/04/06
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/06