[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: should xterm-mouse-mode be on by default?
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: should xterm-mouse-mode be on by default? |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 18:23:49 -0500 (CDT) |
Richard Stallman wrote:
I don't follow the logic. While the failure to implement some mouse
features is clearly a drawback, why would it be better to implement
none than to implement some? I don't see it.
Did you try out Xterm Mouse mode for any prolonged period of time,
performing non-trivial tasks?
Anybody who uses Xterm Mouse mode _needs_ to know about the SHIFT
functionality. That is, needs to have read either the
xterm-mouse-mode docstring or `(emacs)XTerm Mouse'. Otherwise, the
most basic mouse functionality, killing and yanking, does not work
anymore (except _inside_ your Emacs session). Even knowing about
SHIFT, it is a real nuisance.
The lack of the usual visual feedback (Emacs can not track the mouse,
even with Xterm Mouse mode enabled), can also be very confusing,
except to knowledgeable users.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: should xterm-mouse-mode be on by default?, (continued)
- Re: should xterm-mouse-mode be on by default?, Richard Stallman, 2005/04/14
- Re: should xterm-mouse-mode be on by default?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2005/04/14
- Re: should xterm-mouse-mode be on by default?, David Kastrup, 2005/04/14
- Re: should xterm-mouse-mode be on by default?, Richard Stallman, 2005/04/15
- Re: should xterm-mouse-mode be on by default?, Nick Roberts, 2005/04/15
- Re: should xterm-mouse-mode be on by default?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2005/04/15
- Re: should xterm-mouse-mode be on by default?, Miles Bader, 2005/04/15
- Re: should xterm-mouse-mode be on by default?, Richard Stallman, 2005/04/16
- Re: should xterm-mouse-mode be on by default?, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/04/16
- Re: should xterm-mouse-mode be on by default?, Richard Stallman, 2005/04/17
Re: should xterm-mouse-mode be on by default?,
Luc Teirlinck <=
Re: should xterm-mouse-mode be on by default?, Kai Großjohann, 2005/04/14