[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Emacs antialiasing in X

From: David Abrahams
Subject: Re: Emacs antialiasing in X
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:13:49 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt)

Jan Djärv <address@hidden> writes:

> Emfox Zhou wrote:
>> David Abrahams <address@hidden> writes:
>>>in emacs-unicode-2, do I want to keep the latter, since the
>>>character representation is changing?
>>>Also, would it be better to come up with a patch against
>>>emacs-unicode-2 that adds XFT support, or vice-versa?  I am inclined
>>>towards the former.
>> I think emacs-unicode-2 is more recent, and a patch against
>> emacs-unicode-2
>> to add XFT support is better. as a notice, I have tested both of the 
>> branches,
>> and find the XFT branch could not deal properly with chinese, while the 
>> unicode
>> one seems ok for everything.
> I agree, you would start with emacs-unicode-2 and then add XFT to that, i.e. 
> the former as you state above.  W.r.t. characters, this implies that you 
> shall 
> keep whatever is in the emacs-unicode-2 branch.

OK, great.  What about Changelog, NEWS, etc.?  I seriously doubt my
ability to reason about what should be kept from each branch.

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]