[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs antialiasing in X
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs antialiasing in X |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:45:52 +0900 |
2006/1/16, Jan D. <address@hidden>:
> > Are you telling me that edits made to ChangeLog, NEWS, etc., in the
> > XFT branch are expendable?
>
> Kenichi Handa:s suggestion about separate files is a good one.
Yes, giving all "high conflict" files like ChangeLog etc.
branch-specific names is a good idea, and neatly avoids the most
common (and annoying) cause of merge conflicts.
I do it on my personal branches too.
-Miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, (continued)
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Jan Djärv, 2006/01/15
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/15
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/15
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/15
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/15
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/15
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Kenichi Handa, 2006/01/15
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Lőrentey Károly, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Jan D., 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Jan D., 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Jan D., 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Miles Bader, 2006/01/16
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Jan D., 2006/01/17
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/17
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, Miles Bader, 2006/01/17
- Re: Emacs antialiasing in X, David Abrahams, 2006/01/19