[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Problem report #15

From: Stuart D. Herring
Subject: Re: Problem report #15
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-11.EL3

> Yes, you're right.  I think I have fixed it now.
> However, I wonder, why not make conv_lisp_to_sockaddr signal
> a Lisp error if the family is not recognized.  Is there any
> reason not to do this?

That's exactly what I suggested in the previous mail.  However, it might
be good for get_lisp_to_sockaddr_size to signal if it can't figure out a
reasonable size, so that code doesn't break in the future if a new address
family or so is added to one and not the other.


This product is sold by volume, not by mass.  If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]