[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs geometry
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs geometry |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Jul 2006 21:24:40 +0300 |
> From: "Drew Adams" <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 06:41:16 -0700
>
> Not one of the applications on Windows I know opens at (0,0). They
> either let the window manager do the placement or open with the
> geometry they had in their last session. That means opening at (0,0)
> is rather weird an unnatural.
>
> I just checked several, and I guess you're right & I was wrong. In most
> cases I saw, they seemed to open where they were last closed, which means
> that wherever the user positioned them last is respected - that's certainly
> better than random or wherever the WM thinks is good.
We could add code to record the last position in the registry, but I'd
postpone that to after the release.
> Otherwise, if the default behavior is like IE's, that would be good, IMO:
> 0,0, if no previous session, else same as last position (last session);
> cascading right and alternately up and down.
No, 0,0 is a bad choice for those who have the task bar there, we
should not go back to it.
- Emacs geometry, Sridhar Boovaraghavan, 2006/07/24
- RE: Emacs geometry, Drew Adams, 2006/07/24
- Re: Emacs geometry, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/07/24
- RE: Emacs geometry, Drew Adams, 2006/07/25
- Re: Emacs geometry, Ralf Angeli, 2006/07/25
- RE: Emacs geometry, Drew Adams, 2006/07/25
- Re: Emacs geometry,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- RE: Emacs geometry, Drew Adams, 2006/07/25
- Re: Emacs geometry, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/07/25
- RE: Emacs geometry, Drew Adams, 2006/07/25
- Re: Emacs geometry, Jason Rumney, 2006/07/25
- RE: Emacs geometry, Drew Adams, 2006/07/25
- Re: Emacs geometry, Sridhar Boovaraghavan, 2006/07/26
- Re: Emacs geometry, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/07/26
- RE: Emacs geometry, Drew Adams, 2006/07/26
- Re: Emacs geometry, Jason Rumney, 2006/07/26
- RE: Emacs geometry, Drew Adams, 2006/07/26