[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS is the `released version'
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: CVS is the `released version' |
Date: |
Mon, 21 May 2007 10:14:31 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>> It seems wasteful to have a file just for this define-package. Why
>>> not get the info out of the .el files just as for a one-file package?
>>
>> I don't think the waste is very significant. Butm I agree that
>> package.el could simply look for a define-package call in every .el
>> file. And it could simply report an error if there are 2 or more
>> such calls.
> Could also be information in a comment, properly formatted.
Indeed, probably using the same format as is currently used for
single-file packages.
Stefan
- Re: package.el, (continued)
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Richard Stallman, 2007/05/19
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Tom Tromey, 2007/05/19
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Richard Stallman, 2007/05/20
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Tom Tromey, 2007/05/20
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Stefan Monnier, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version', David Kastrup, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version',
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Tom Tromey, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Richard Stallman, 2007/05/22
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Trent Buck, 2007/05/22
- Re: CVS is the `released version', David Kastrup, 2007/05/22
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Richard Stallman, 2007/05/24
Re: CVS is the `released version', Lukasz Stafiniak, 2007/05/10